Evidence
Premium IOL Decision Support

Premium IOL selection needs a rationale, not a black box.

PrecisionIOL positions premium IOL planning as a surgeon-controlled workflow: match the patient, review ocular risk, compare tradeoffs, explain expectations, and document why the strategy is reasonable.

Updated August 12, 2026 · Monofocal-plus · Toric · EDOF · Multifocal · Adjustable IOL
Clinical decision support only. PrecisionIOL helps surgeons review, compare, counsel, and document. It does not autonomously select treatment or replace surgeon judgment, diagnostic testing, or device labeling.

What decision support should surface

Patient goals

Driving, night driving, computer work, reading, hobbies, desire for glasses independence, tolerance for halos, and willingness for follow-up visits.

Ocular risk

Irregular cornea, high HOA, ocular surface disease, glaucoma, macular disease, post-LASIK/PRK/RK status, and biometry repeatability.

Optical tradeoffs

Expected distance, intermediate, and near profile; dysphotopsia risk; contrast expectations; residual spectacle dependence; and enhancement possibility.

Documentation

Why the pathway fits, what was discussed, what requires verification, and which assumptions the surgeon accepted before surgery.

Lens pathways to compare

PathwayBest fitCounseling emphasis
Monofocal / monofocal-plusQuality-first patients, night drivers, lower tolerance for optical symptomsTarget distance, glasses expectations, astigmatism plan
ToricMeaningful regular astigmatism with reliable axis measurementsAxis confidence, residual cylinder, rotation risk
EDOFDistance/intermediate priority, computer use, moderate desire for rangeNear limitations, glare/halo possibility, contrast expectations
Multifocal / trifocalHigh desire for range and glasses independence with healthy opticsDysphotopsia, neuroadaptation, corneal/retinal screening
Adjustable IOLPatients who can return for postoperative refinement and comply with instructionsVisit burden, UV compliance, adjustment and lock-in sequence

How PrecisionIOL should be framed

The product should not say "the best IOL is X." A safer, more clinically useful output is: "this pathway is being surfaced because these measurements, history, goals, and workflow constraints fit; these are the tradeoffs; these are the verification steps before final planning."

That explanation layer is the differentiator. Manufacturer tools can be excellent inside their ecosystems. PrecisionIOL can compete as the vendor-neutral layer that helps a surgeon unify inputs, counseling, preference, and documentation.

Use decision support inside the planner

Review lens fit, warnings, lifestyle scoring, and patient-facing counseling from the same case workflow.

Open IOL Planner